Field-directed rerouteEmail directive + 34 labor hrs + material PO
4 records
›
Free pilot audits · Commercial electrical contractors
Find work you've done but haven't billed.
UnbilledWork connects scope, field activity, labor, materials, change orders, and billing to surface project work that may deserve a closer look.
✓ Start with one project
✓ Redacted files are fine
✓ No system migration
Project revenue review
Illustrative
North Tower · Electrical
Records connected
Review workspace
Potential work to review
$24,860
Illustrative example · not a guaranteed recovery amount
Items worth reviewingEvidence
Weekend overtimeTimecard variance + shutdown note
3 records
›
Additional materialPurchase record not matched to a CO
2 records
›
✓
Evidence linkedEvery flag points back to records
!
Possible billing gapHuman review recommended
Built for project-based electrical work
CommercialIndustrialSpecialty contracting
THE GAP
The work happened. The records drifted apart.
Revenue leakage rarely looks like one obvious mistake. It hides between the field, project management, purchasing, and billing.
THE OLD WAYDisconnected project trail
×
People remember the extra work. The supporting records live in different places.
WITH UNBILLEDWORKOne evidence-backed review
✓
Project signals are reviewed together, with each finding tied back to supporting records.
Field direction
A superintendent asks for a change. Work begins before the paperwork catches up.
Labor variance
Extra hours or overtime appear in time records without a clean billing path.
Material additions
Purchases show added scope that may not be reflected in the change-order log.
Billing disconnects
Supported work exists, but no matching pending or billed item is easy to find.
HOW IT WORKS
Start small. Review one real project.
No system replacement. No giant implementation. The pilot is designed to answer one practical question: is there project work worth investigating?
01
Share the project records
Send exports or redacted files from an active or recently completed project.
PDF · XLSX · CSV · project exports02
We cross-check the project story
Scope, field activity, labor, materials, change orders, and billing are reviewed together.
Evidence before assumptions03
Get a clear review list
Potential gaps are organized with the source records that raised each flag.
Your team decides what is valid
WHAT WE REVIEW
The records you already have. Seen together.
For the pilot, you do not need to connect every system. We can start with exported project files and build the review around the data you already keep.
Start with one project →Contract & scope
Original scope, exclusions, proposals, and relevant revisions.
Change orders
Pending, approved, rejected, and billed change records.
Labor & time
Timecards, overtime, crews, cost-code activity, and labor exports.
Materials & POs
Purchases and material activity that may support added work.
Field records
Daily logs, RFIs, directives, emails, photos, and supporting notes.
Billing records
Invoices, SOVs, billing exports, and project cost context.
LIMITED PILOT
Let us review one project at no charge.
We are accepting a small number of commercial electrical contractors for pilot project reviews. Redacted files are welcome.
- ✓ One active or completed project
- ✓ No software migration required
- ✓ Findings tied to source records
PILOT PRINCIPLE
“If we don't find anything useful, no problem. If we do, we'll show you what raised the flag and where the evidence came from.”
UW
UnbilledWorkProject revenue review
START A FREE AUDIT
Tell us about one project.
It takes about a minute. We will reply by email to confirm whether the project is a fit for the pilot and what records would be useful.
Prefer email?
farrux@unbilledwork.com ↗
FAQ
Practical questions, straight answers.
If your project records are messy, that is normal. The pilot is specifically meant to learn from real-world workflows.
What do you need to review a project?+
Usually a combination of contract/scope documents, change-order records, labor or job-cost exports, material/purchase records, field documentation, and billing records. We start with what you already have.
Do we need to connect Procore, Sage, or QuickBooks?+
No. For the pilot we can begin with exported files. Integrations are not required to test whether the review is useful.
Can we redact customer names or sensitive details?+
Yes. Redacted project files are fine as long as the records still contain enough context to understand the scope, activity, and billing trail.
Is every flagged item definitely billable?+
No. A flag means the records suggest something is worth human review. Contract terms, notice requirements, approvals, and project facts ultimately determine whether an item is valid.
Who is the pilot for right now?+
Our current focus is commercial and industrial electrical contractors in the United States with project-based work and active change-order workflows.
ONE PROJECT. ONE QUESTION.
Let's review it →